How God Used Good News

by Steve | Oct 24, 2024 | In the News, Perspective / News

How God Used Good News

By Warren Budd

Many Methodists have believed that the ministry of Good News encompassed just lobbying at General Conference and publishing an attractive, informative magazine. But our family – along with countless others – can attest that it involved much more.

The most visible fruit of the Good News ministry has been its assistance in the formation of the Global Methodist Church. But there were other important initiatives pursued by Good News over the years that had a profound effect on United Methodists searching for a genuine expression of Wesleyan scriptural Christianity. Besides producing Sunday school literature, helping initiate the formation of the Mission Society, and spearheading an alternative women’s mission group, Good News produced numerous books and pamphlets on orthodox Methodist belief. Good News also counseled with literally thousands of United Methodists who were experiencing apostasy in their local church, urging them to remain United Methodist and to remember that they were serving on a mission field.

There was another ministry pursued by Good News that allowed evangelical United Methodists to understand that they were not alone. Up until the mid-nineties, Good News held convocations at venues across the United States that brought inspiring speakers and vibrant worship to orthodox United Methodists seeking a deeper relationship with God. There were programs for children and youth as well as informative breakout sessions.

In 1973 I made what I thought was a commitment to Jesus Christ. Yet I really did not understand the nature of salvation. I struggled for six years to discern what God had in store for me. A spark was ignited in 1979 when a pastor friend, Dr. Charles Boland, gave me a couple of Good News magazines. I devoured them. In one of the magazines was a review of Dr. Robert Tuttle’s book John Wesley: His Life and Theology. After reading it I became fascinated with Wesleyan theology. In the summer of 1980, I saw that the author would be speaking at a Good News convocation in July.

Using all of the persuasive skills I could muster, I talked my wife Courtenay into dragging our (then) four children to a Good News meeting where we knew absolutely no one. She later told me she thought I had lost my mind.

Our oldest child Becky later told me that this convocation had a “staggering” effect on the spiritual lives of our family. The vibrant worship, especially youth-directed outreach led by the New Directions singing group out of North Carolina, and the youth Bible study taught by a godly woman, led our two daughters to give their lives to Christ. God has used both of these women in mighty ways.

At the Lake Junaluska convocation, Courtenay and I had a profound experience with the presence of God, returning home greatly changed.

Becky would tour two summers with the New Directions. Later, as a student at the University of the South, she helped found a chapter of Campus Crusade for Christ and was with them in Russia just after the Berlin Wall fell.

Our younger daughter Dorothy joined Youth with a Mission in Mexico as a high school student. She founded a Fellowship of Christian Athletes chapter at the high school where she began her career as a math teacher and continues leading the group twenty-eight years later. Courtenay has been a leader in the Disciple study in our church, and I have served the church on a national and local level.

The capstone of my Christian walk has been the five years I spent pursuing a Masters of Theological studies at Asbury Seminary. Last year I graduated at age eighty-two.

The five terms I served on the Good News Board introduced me to many very special friends; Jim Heidinger, Ed Robb, Jr., Bob Tuttle, and James Robb, to name just a few. In the nineties these friendships would meet deep personal needs as Courtenay experienced severe health problems, my finances took a plunge, and, after a two-year ordeal, we discovered that we had lost our precious son Bryant.

On the night that we were given that devastating news, I called Jim Heidinger. He said that he would be right down. Jim drove from Wilmore, Kentucky, to Newnan, Georgia, in order to minister to us. James Robb flew down and Ed Robb III and others ministered to us by phone.

On May 20, 2023, I was packed in the Sherman cafeteria with about three-hundred and eighty other soon-to-be graduates of Asbury Seminary. About twenty African graduates began singing a praise song in their native language. Even though we did not understand the words, we joined in, praising and thanking God for his many blessings. We then marched into the Sherman gym which was packed with well-wishers and family. The Rev. Danny Key led the gathering in a robust, Spirit-filled singing of And Can It Be, what many refer to as the Asbury Seminary fight song. As I sang along, I began remembering the ministries, as well as friends I had met through Good News and Asbury Seminary. I looked in the audience and saw that Courtenay and our two daughters had tears in their eyes.

When God’s Spirit urged us to attend that Lake Junaluska convocation, he blessed us ten-thousand squared.

Warren Budd is a member of Midway Methodist Church in Midway, Georgia. A recent graduate of Asbury Theological Seminary, he has been a General Conference delegate, served on the United Methodist Board of Global Ministries (Theology and Mission Task Force), as well as the board of UMCOR. He has been a board member of Good News and is a Certified Lay Minister in the Global Methodist Church. Warren has taught Sunday School for 38 years. Photo: Good News magazine spread from 1980. Insets: (Center) Warren Budd (Right) Cover of “John Wesley: His Life and Theology” by Robert G Tuttle, Jr.

Finding Effective Leaders

by Steve | Aug 30, 2024 | In the News, Perspective / News

Finding Effective Leaders

By Rob Renfroe

Recently I had a conversation with a friend who is grateful for the Global Methodist Church but who is concerned for its future. Not because of anything that is presently occurring but because “we’re all human and we all have a tendency to drift from our good intentions and commitments.” He wondered how we can ensure that the GMC will remain committed to the Bible, to making disciples and to refusing to conform to the world. He is wise enough to understand the GMC may not be in danger of losing its way anytime soon, but now is the time to put in place policies and structures which will encourage, if not guarantee, that future generations are true to the vision of the church’s founders.

After a good conversation about structures that will make bishops and pastors accountable to the church unlike what we’ve seen in my lifetime, I told my friend what may be an overstatement, but I believe it. “Just about any system can work if you have the right people in place. No system will work if the wrong people are in charge.”

That’s a clumsy way of stating what I know to be true, as leadership expert John Maxwell says: “Everything rises and falls with leadership.” Great corporations, great schools, great governments, great churches have great leaders. They have leaders who cast vision, inspire people, equip others to be effective, raise up and empower additional leaders, keep the organization faithful to its purpose and remove those who would subvert its mission.

The role of bishops within the GMC is still being determined. There are differing ideas concerning how much authority they should possess and whether they will serve primarily as teachers and exhorters or whether they will also be deeply involved in the administrative affairs of an annual conference. I have my preference, but this is one where good people can differ.

Either way, it is critical that we elect people who are right for the role of leadership. In my past denomination, persons were often chosen for the episcopacy because he or she had been a district superintendent, the bishop’s executive officer, or had served the church on a national board. Others were elected because they were genuinely likeable and could work with all kinds of people. Some rose to the top because they represented a faction within a conference that wanted to promote a particular agenda. In other words – position, personality, politics. An organization that chooses its leadership using those criteria will over time drift from its mission, decline in numbers and likely implode because of competing visions.

At the upcoming General Conference in San Jose the GMC may for the first time elect six interim bishops who will serve for two years and who may be re-elected for a longer term at the following General Conference in 2026. If we should not elect our episcopal leaders based on past positions, personality or politics, what then should we use as criteria? Competence, compassion and character.

Competence: Has the person been effective in ministry? Ministry is a broad term. It encompasses everything from hospital visits to setting budgets to delivering a sermon. Are we looking for persons who capable jacks-of-all-trades? No. We are looking for people who have a proven track record of making disciples of Jesus Christ. We need men and women who have inspired and equipped others to live holy, godly lives; who know what it takes and can teach others how “to grow a church;” and who have led congregations that have impacted their communities through ministries of caring for the poor and the dispossessed.

I once served under a bishop I admired in many ways, though our theologies differed a bit. She loved Jesus and wanted the church to grow. To her credit she brought a respected church growth expert to our conference who spoke about the need to plant new churches. She followed his presentation with her vision of starting many new congregations and stated her commitment to support the pastors who were willing to answer the call. Many did. It was exciting to witness. At the next meeting she presented these pastors to us so we might pray for them. Then she asked those who would be mentoring and leading these mainly young pastors in their new ministries to stand. They were the twelve district superintendents of our conference. One of the twelve had started a church. Practically none had ever grown a church. They were expected to teach what they had never done and what they had shown no capacity to be able to do. Sad to say, we heard very little about this new initiative in the following months and years. Why? Because the wrong persons had been chosen to lead.

The GMC needs bishops who are more than good guys and nice gals with fine intentions and a desire to serve. We need leaders who have done the work and who can teach the rest of us how to do our work in a better, more effective way.

Compassion. We need leaders who are committed to the truth of the Gospel and the authority of the Scriptures. Here there can be no compromise. At the same time, I believe the philosopher-theologian Francis Schaeffer was correct when he wrote: “There is nothing more ugly than an orthodoxy without understanding or without compassion.” Jesus was effective because he came with “grace and truth.” Not one without the other. Not one more than the other but both together.

One reason those referred to as “the sinners” in Jesus’ day listened to him when he told them to “repent because the Kingdom of God is at hand” was because they believed he cared for them. Unlike the Pharisees who also told them to repent, when “sinners” heard Jesus say those words, they felt his love for them. They understood that his intention was to lift them up to an abundant life not put them down because of the life they had lived.

We need bishops who love people – lost people, hurting people, sinful people, angry people, people who are difficult to love. Why? Because that’s our mission. The GMC was not brought into existence to create a church where you and I are comfortable, or where there’s no liberal influence, or where the doctrine is just right. The GMC exists to change the world. Our mission is to “make disciples” – that means reaching people who are lost and hurting and sinful and being used by God to transform their lives. We do not reach people if we do not love them. They will not care what we know until they know we care for them. We need bishops who know that we exist for others, not for ourselves, and who will compel us to be in mission because he or she loves people the way Jesus did.

Character. For a person to lead, he or she must have followers. For people to follow you, they must trust you. To trust you, people must believe you will do what’s right – not what’s easy, not what’s popular, not what’s best for you, not what creates the least disruption or controversy – but what’s right for the mission.

Leadership is never easy. Leaders must do difficult things, and they often must act when they are uncertain what is best. People will forgive mistakes in judgment. But they will never trust or follow a person who is lacking in integrity. Our bishops must be persons who have no personal agendas, no desire to be praised, no reticence to do what is difficult even if it is unpopular. People do not expect perfection. But they must be able to say to themselves, “I don’t know why he did that. But I know who he is, so I will trust him. I don’t understand her decision. But I am certain she believed it was best for achieving our mission together.” Little inspires people more than a person of character who is strong and true under pressure. And nothing destroys leadership as quickly as a lack of integrity. So, our bishops must not simply be good people. They must be persons who are strong and courageous and who live for an audience of One.

How can we guarantee the future of the GMC? Good policies and structures, along with real accountability, will certainly help. But ultimately, it will come down to leadership. Leadership that is characterized by competence, compassion, and character.

Please be in prayer for the delegates to the upcoming General Conference this September. They have important work to accomplish. But nothing will be more important than choosing who will  lead us into the new future that God has graciously provided for us.

Rob Renfroe is a Global Methodist clergyperson and president and publisher of Good News. Photo: United Methodist church leaders confer during a business session of their 2024 General Conference in Charlotte, N.C. From left are the Rev. Gary Graves, secretary of the conference, and Bishops Bruce Ough and Carlo A. Rapanut. Photo by Mike DuBose, UM News.

A Parting Thank You

by Steve | Aug 19, 2024 | In the News, Perspective / News

A Parting Thank You

By Rob Renfroe and Thomas Lambrecht

Good News was founded in 1967 to be a voice for scriptural Christianity within what would in 1968 become The United Methodist Church. Now, fifty-seven years later, our board of directors and our executive leadership team have determined it is time for Good News to conclude its work.

So, over the next few months we will be in the process of closing our office and one final edition of the magazine will be published after the first General Conference of the Global Methodist Church this September. We will continue to publish the weekly Perspective into the fall, and our website will continue to be available as an archive of Good News’ ministry and history.

By God’s grace, Good News played an instrumental role in forming the Global Methodist Church and in helping over 7,000 churches leave The UM Church. We need to thank God for how he has used our efforts in the past and now step into the future he has for Wesleyan Christians who are committed to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and the authority of the Bible.

I became president of Good News in 2009. Tom Lambrecht, after many years as a board member, board secretary, and board chair, moved from Wisconsin to Texas and took on the role of vice president in 2011. We are writing this editorial together primarily to say, “thank you.”

Earlier this summer, each of us transferred our ministerial credentials from the UM Church to the Global Methodist Church. We had remained within the UM Church so we might attend one final General Conference and work on behalf of our African and other international friends who wanted the same opportunity to disaffiliate that we in the U.S. had been given.

But each of us has now said good-bye to The United Methodist Church. Given all we have said and written, much of it critical of The UM Church, it may be surprising that what fills our hearts at this time is gratitude. We are immensely thankful for the lives and ministries God has given us and for the opportunities provided to us by the UM Church.

There is no higher calling on a human life than preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ and shepherding his people. For some reason that is difficult to fathom, God in his grace gave us the immense privilege of proclaiming his word and serving his church as pastors. For his calling on our lives and the opportunity to minister to his people, we shall be forever grateful.

We were pastors within The United Methodist Church, each of us for over 40 years – Rob in East Texas and Tom in Wisconsin. It was the UM Church that recognized our gifts, affirmed our calling, and allowed us to serve its congregations. Welcoming us with open arms over forty years ago may be a decision some within the UM Church have come to lament. But we are grateful for a church that made a place for us to be in ministry, to do the work of God, and to fulfill his calling on our lives.

Even more, we are grateful for The United Methodist Church because it was there we came to faith in Jesus Christ. For Rob, it was a summer youth director hired by the First United Methodist Church of Texas City, Texas, in the summer of 1972. His name was Eddie Wills. It was the beauty of his relationship with Jesus that showed me there was more to Christianity than going to church and being a good kid – and that caused me late one night to kneel by my bed and ask Jesus to come into my life.

For Tom, it was a confirmation class led by a student pastor serving as an intern in 1968 at Memorial United Methodist Church in Greenfield, Wisconsin, where I grew up. His name was Jerry Cline, who worked at our church one year while studying at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary. That confirmation class helped me understand the Bible, the message of God’s love, and God’s desire that I become a disciple. When we sang “O Jesus, I have promised” on confirmation Sunday, I gave my commitment to follow Jesus for a lifetime, and he has never let me down.

There’s a well-known line that a year from now you will be the same person you are today except for the books you read and the people with whom you spend time. What’s true of a year is also true of a lifetime. And we have known the best people. The best – because of The United Methodist Church. Through our work to renew and reform the church we were blessed to spend time with, learn from, be inspired and formed by many of “the greats” – Maxie Dunnam, Bill Hinson, Eddie Fox, John Ed Mathison, Jimmy Buskirk, Ira Gallaway, Ed Robb, Jr., Ed Robb III, Jim Heidinger, Billy Abraham, Kenneth Kinghorn, Gary Moore, Ben Witherington III, John Grenfell Jr., Riley Case, Pat Miller, and a host of others. There was a time when we were in awe to be in the same room as these giants of the faith, sitting in a corner, listening closely to what they said, hoping not to say anything foolish in their presence if called upon to speak. And later as they passed the torch to us, we continued their work, so desperately wanting to make them proud. Many of them have gone to be with the Lord, while others have retired from active ministry, but none are gone from our hearts. For this blessing we will be forever grateful.

How would the story of The United Methodist Church have played out if Good News had never existed? If Charles Keysor had not written that first article “Methodism’s Silent Minority” that gave so many Bible-believing Methodists a reason to stay in the church instead of giving up and walking away nearly five decades ago? If the original board members had not held national conferences that brought UM evangelicals together – in fact, created a movement? If they had not done the hard work for decades at General Conference after General Conference? If they had not been willing to suffer the slings and arrows, the false accusations and the demeaning attacks of liberal and institutionalist church leaders back when the fight was truly difficult and often mean-spirited? If Jim Heidinger, a prince of the church with a gracious spirit and a backbone of steel, had not taken up the work after Keysor? How the story would have gone, we don’t know. But we are sure of this – there would be no Global Methodist Church. The vast majority of traditionalists would have left years ago, the UM Church would have gone radically progressive long before now, and whatever evangelical movement might have come out of it would, at best, be a mere shell of the GMC.

So, we are grateful for Good News. Grateful for its work, its influence, and its successes. And we are beyond grateful that God was gracious enough to allow us to help lead its efforts for the past fifteen years. Following Chuck Keysor and Jim Heidinger – what an honor and a privilege God has given us.

As we leave The United Methodist Church and as we conclude the work of Good News, we look at our lives and we are reminded of the words of the psalmist: “Lord, you alone are my portion and my cup; you make my lot secure. The lines have fallen for me in pleasant places; surely, I have a delightful inheritance” (Psalm 16.5-6).

The lines have fallen in pleasant places for us. We could not imagine better lives than the ones God has given us. Nor could we be more grateful. Grateful to The United Methodist Church that provided us the opportunity to be in ministry, to those who led us to faith in Christ, to our wives and children who upheld us in ministry, to the congregations that blessed us, to the men and women who inspired us, and to all of you who have supported us and the work of Good News. Please know you are dear to us, and we will forever be thankful for you.

Rob Renfroe is a Global Methodist clergyperson and president and publisher of Good News. 

Thomas Lambrecht is a ​​​​​​​Global Methodist clergyperson and vice president of Good News.

Nigerian Conflict and Chaos

by Steve | Aug 12, 2024 | In the News, Perspective / News

Nigerian Conflict and Chaos

By Thomas Lambrecht

This has been a difficult summer for the Good News office. Hurricane Beryl caused two weeks of power outages, preventing us from working in the office or accomplishing much of anything. Technical issues caused our website to go down, leaving some people to believe we had gone out of business (we have not!). Then our email failed to work for several days. Everything is in the process of being fixed, and we are back up and running again. We are resuming our regular schedule of Perspective e-newsletters.

As some would say, this chaos is a “first-world problem,” in that most of the world is not so dependent upon electricity or technology as we are in the U.S. The United Methodist Church of Nigeria (UMCN) has experienced a fair amount of chaos this summer, as well, and its chaos is much more damaging.

As reported by the Global Methodist Church, the four annual conferences of UMCN have voted unanimously to withdraw from The United Methodist Church and join the Global Methodist Church. In the wake of that decision, Bishop John Wesley Yohanna resigned from the UM Church and was received as a bishop of the GM Church. Presidents pro tempore were appointed for the four annual conferences, and they have begun to operate as annual conferences of the GM Church.

That paragraph makes this transition sound simple and easy, but it was anything but.

As we and others have reported in the past, the Nigerian church has been riven with conflict since 2012, when Bishop Yohanna was elected bishop. One faction of the church refused to accept him as their bishop and withdrew from the UM Church to establish their own independent Methodist church. Repeated attempts at reconciliation over the years have been unsuccessful.

Several years ago, a key leader in the UMCN, Ande Emmanuel, began to resist the authority of Bishop Yohanna. He, too, has gathered a faction of supporters within the church and attempts to portray his group as the true UM Church in Nigeria. According to sources in Nigeria, there are allegations that Emmanuel has fomented violence against fellow church members by hiring “thugs” to attack and beat persons belonging to the mainstream Yohanna part of the church, disrupting worship services and other church activities. Emmanuel filed lawsuits in court attempting to take over the property of the UMCN.

Emmanuel filed complaints against Yohanna through the church accountability process, and Yohanna filed complaints against Emmanuel and his group. Those complaints were supposedly resolved by a Just Resolution last year agreed to by all parties. However, the terms of the agreement appear not to have been fully implemented. Each side accuses the other of failing to live up to the terms of the agreement.

The conflict came to a head around the time of the 2024 General Conference, when Emmanuel became a frequent speaker on the floor of the conference advocating for regionalization, which the bulk of the Nigerian church opposes. When Emmanuel and other delegates returned to Nigeria, they were greeted by protesters opposing regionalization and what they characterized as the LGBTQ+ agenda. Emmanuel’s group engaged in counter protests, and the threat of violence caused the local government in one city to close all United Methodist churches for a month to allow things to cool off.

Meanwhile, the court ruled that Emmanuel’s lawsuit was without merit, dismissed the lawsuit, and fined Emmanuel for bringing the suit. Many Nigerian members unhappy with the General Conference actions agitated for the UMCN to show its opposition to those actions.

Bishop John Schol (Greater New Jersey and Eastern Pennsylvania) was sent to Nigeria in June to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the conflict between Emmanuel and Yohanna and their groups. Instead, Schol reportedly got an earful from the annual conference cabinets voicing their displeasure at the General Conference actions. He was unable to fulfill his mission of reconciliation and was apparently escorted to the airport for his own security.

Bishop Yohanna had called special sessions of the four Nigerian annual conferences. The four conferences voted unanimously to exit The United Methodist Church with all their properties to join the Global Methodist Church. Bishop Yohanna and nearly all the district superintendents of the four conferences then resigned from the UM Church to become Global Methodist.

The UM Council of Bishops then appointed Bishops Schol, Nhiwatiwa (Zimbabwe), and Streiff (Southern Europe, retired) to serve as a team of interim bishops in Nigeria. In their communication, the bishops allege the special annual conference sessions were not held according to the Discipline. “There are reports that Annual Conferences were held, and Conferences voted to leave The United Methodist Church. This is not true. There were no Conference Sessions convened according to our Book of Discipline, and most delegates/conference members were not invited to these gatherings.”

Reports on the ground and official communications from UMCN leaders, including a press conference held by Bishop Yohanna, state that the conference sessions were held and that they did take action to withdraw. It is probable that annual conference members belonging to Emmanuel’s group may not have been included in the conferences, since they had renounced the authority of Bishop Yohanna. But reports on the ground indicate at least two of the conferences had over 80 percent attendance.

The bishops’ letter also alleges that “a group of United Methodists were [sic] imprisoned due to complaints by the former cabinet and leaders because they are committed to staying with The United Methodist Church.” However, a church leader identified with the GM Church reported on Tuesday, “Four members of Sunkani District are in detention yesterday morning. Two of them are GMC members while two are UMCN members. They were in detention due to what happened in Sunkani District on Sunday, August 4, that led to the closure of our Church. [This alludes to the threat of violence I mentioned above that caused the government to close the churches for a time.] The DS and the Church secretary of Sunkani District are our GMC members who were in detention along with two members of the UMCN.”

Information received on Wednesday indicated that the members were released from detention. Based on this report, the detention was due to the threat of violent altercation, rather than because some members wanted to remain in the UM Church. Indeed, two of the four detainees were GM Church leaders, not those wanting to remain in the UM Church.

In the midst of this chaotic situation, the bulk of the Nigerian church is moving to the GM Church. Some individual congregations and pastors have yet to decide which way they want to move. Out of a church that most recently reported 600,000 members, several hundred thousand of them are moving to the GM Church. It will be a number of months until the dust settles and we know for sure what proportion of the UMCN is now GMC.

This move of Nigeria is significant. It was done according to the laws of Nigeria, rather than by any process that is in the Discipline. While the General Conference closed the door on any official disaffiliation pathways in the UM Church, legal realities in many countries could still allow disaffiliation by annual conferences.

The members of Nigeria join a rapidly growing GM Church in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Central African Republic, Tanzania, Kenya-Ethiopia (which is also growing dramatically), and South Africa. A number of other countries are poised to inaugurate the GM Church, as well, with other countries moving toward that goal. It appears that only a handful of the African countries that have a United Methodist presence do not already have a movement to establish the GM Church in their country. That means 20 or more African countries may have GM conferences in the next year or so.

The Global Methodist Church is truly growing as a global movement of the Holy Spirit. Many are looking forward to the convening General Conference September 20-26 in Costa Rica as a seminal moment in reinforcing the solid foundations for this new denomination.

Thomas Lambrecht is a ​​​​​​​Global Methodist clergyperson and vice president of Good News. Photo: Nigeria Area Bishop John Wesley Yohanna says a prayer alongside members of his cabinet during a gathering of United Methodists from the North East and Southern Nigeria annual conferences on July 24 at McBride United Methodist Church in Jalingo. Yohanna announced July 29 that he has left The United Methodist Church. Photo by Ramson Danjuma, communications director for the North East Nigeria Conference (via United Methodist News).

A Promise Kept and a Promise Spurned

by Steve | Jun 14, 2024 | In the News, Perspective / News

A Promise Kept and a Promise Spurned

By Thomas Lambrecht

As United Methodists continue to become aware of the actions taken by the 2024 General Conference, responses range from celebration to confusion to disagreement to disenchantment. Many are asking the question: What does this mean for me and my church?

For congregations, there will probably be little short-term change. United Methodist life will go on pretty much as it has in the past. However, clergy will be able to officiate for same-sex weddings and churches will be able to host such weddings. How that could affect your congregation will be unique to your situation.

Longer-term, there will be an evolution of dramatic change. United Methodism has redefined marriage to include same-sex unions. The expectation that sex is reserved for marriage has been removed. The definition of “immorality” has been deleted, weakening its enforcement. It is likely that any sexual relationship between consenting adult clergy (to say nothing about laity) will be permitted or at least ignored.

Apportionment money will be spent to promote the acceptance of homosexuality. This includes the LGBTQ+ history institute announced at the General Conference by the Commission on Archives and History. LGBTQ persons must be nominated and elected to serve on all the general church boards and agencies. “Sexual orientation” has been defined as an immutable class similar to race and (male/female) gender. Local churches are to be trained to accept LGBTQ persons as their pastor, and appointments are to be made regardless of sexual orientation. While a gay pastor may not initially be forced upon a congregation, all congregations will be expected to become open to receiving a gay pastor, just as they are now expected to be open to receiving a woman pastor or a pastor of a different race or ethnicity.

Congregations that find themselves uncomfortable with the direction set for the denomination by the 2024 General Conference have few options. Their ability to disaffiliate and retain their property depends upon the grace of their particular annual conference. This week demonstrated two opposite approaches to the question of disaffiliation.

South Carolina Faithfulness

The South Carolina Annual Conference was one of the last conferences to permit congregational disaffiliation. Bishop Jonathan Holston ruled that Par. 2553 could not be used in South Carolina because the annual conference was enforcing the Book of Discipline’s requirements around marriage, sexuality, and LGBTQ persons. Finally last year, the conference decided that it would use Par. 2549 to allow churches to disaffiliate and retain their property through closure. The church would be closed and the property resold to the congregation in exchange for an established fee similar to what was required under Par. 2553 plus ten percent of the property value. Under these provisions, 113 churches disaffiliated in 2023.

Although disaffiliation under Par. 2553 was to end on December 31, 2023, South Carolina promised to allow further disaffiliations under Par. 2549 following the 2024 General Conference.

This week the South Carolina Conference kept its promise and voted to allow 112 more churches to disaffiliate under the same terms. As reported by an annual conference press release, the conference acknowledged that these churches “find themselves unable to serve the purpose for which they were organized, because issues related to human sexuality have prevented them, in that they cannot accept the actions taken in The United Methodist Church.”

The disaffiliating churches represented over 13 percent of the conference’s congregations and about 12 percent of the conference’s membership. They ranged in size from 11 members to 2,110 members. Altogether, about 24 percent of the conference’s pre-Covid congregations have disaffiliated.

The conference further voted to recommend to its trustees that one more round of disaffiliations be allowed in 2024, to be approved by the 2025 annual conference. The trustees will make the final determination on that recommendation. If carried out, it would represent a good faith effort to provide churches that cannot continue within United Methodism a fair way to disaffiliate (albeit at a somewhat elevated cost).

The Northeastern Jurisdiction

In a dramatically contrary move, the College of Bishops of the Northeastern Jurisdiction released a letter outlining their position on disaffiliation. Their letter announced that “The NEJ College of Bishops will uphold the decision made by the delegates at the postponed 2020 General Conference to discontinue any disaffiliation process and NOT support any more disaffiliations.”

These bishops adopted the interpretation that the 2024 General Conference eliminated all disaffiliation pathways and effectively forbid further disaffiliations from taking place. “To be clear, the General Conference indicated through the legislation it approved that disaffiliation is no longer a path for leaving the denomination. There was no extension of disaffiliation, and the disaffiliation paragraph was removed from The Book of Discipline.”

(The tenor of the debate at the General Conference was that annual conferences were able to set their own terms for releasing congregations without those terms being set by the General Conference. While some delegates thought all disaffiliations should end, other delegates preferred to allow annual conferences to make that determination. The General Conference did not forbid disaffiliation. It just failed to provide a uniform disaffiliation pathway for the whole church.)

The bishops’ statement leaves the door open a crack for using Par. 2549, the closure paragraph. “People have inquired about the use of other disciplinary paragraphs to allow disaffiliations. … Two paragraphs were considered in the past: paragraph 2548 was ruled by the Judicial Council of The United Methodist Church not to be used for disaffiliations, and paragraph 2549 is for a church closure and how to handle the property. Now that disaffiliations have concluded, the College of Bishops will ensure that annual conferences receive the best value for any sold property.”

It appears bishops might be willing to sell a church’s property back to the congregation for “the best value” they can get for it, which might be higher than the costs imposed by Par. 2553. A recent communication from Bishop John Schol of Eastern Pennsylvania and Greater New Jersey indicated a congregation could buy its property for its appraised value. Some congregations may be able to afford such a cost, but many may not.

Back to the Individual

This brings the question back to the impact of the 2024 General Conference’s actions on each individual United Methodist. Some will welcome and celebrate those actions. Others may not have an opinion on the matter and be willing to tolerate whatever comes. Others may disagree with those actions but are willing to remain in the denomination despite those disagreements. Some of this last group may conceive their calling as continuing a traditionalist witness within the UM Church, despite its overwhelming bent toward a more progressive understanding of the faith.

For others, however, remaining United Methodist poses a dilemma of conscience in being part of a church that affirms and promotes types of relationship that the Bible names as sinful. For these individuals, there are several options:

• If a supermajority of their congregation’s members agree that this dilemma of conscience necessitates disaffiliation, the members could pursue the possibility through the established channels of their annual conference.
• Where the annual conference has closed the door on disaffiliation, the congregation cannot afford the cost of disaffiliation to retain the buildings and assets, or a significant group of members falls short of reaching the two-thirds vote required for disaffiliation, a group of departing members could form the core of a new church. This is happening in many places across the U.S., Africa, and the Philippines. The Global Methodist Church and its partner ministry the River Network have training, support, and some resources available to assist new congregations in being formed. There are advantages to taking this route, including the ability to envision and structure the church for 21^st century ministry, rather than being saddled with outdated buildings, organizational structures, and ministry patterns. Starting afresh also poses challenges in terms of the time and energy involved in creating a new ministry. Where the people and resources are available, this approach can be an exciting avenue to expand Gospel ministry.
• Where congregational disaffiliation or creating a new church are not possible, individuals may need to seek out a new church for conscience’s sake that more closely identifies with their theological perspective. Wesleyan or Wesleyan-friendly denominations include the Free Methodist, Wesleyan, Nazarene, Christian and Missionary Alliance, and Assemblies of God denominations, among others. Most non-denominational churches are not Wesleyan in theology, although some are. Careful searching could yield a compatible congregation nearby that would further one’s growth in discipleship and provide opportunities to serve in ministering to the community.

These are all weighty decisions, both at the congregational and individual levels. They need to be surrounded in prayer and consultation with family and friends. Resources for congregations and individuals are available from the Wesleyan Covenant Association’s Revive! collection. A number of valuable and practical presentations have been recorded and are being prepared for posting through their website.

One hopes that more annual conferences will follow the South Carolina model of providing a good faith approach graciously allowing churches to disaffiliate who find they can no longer function under the New United Methodism. As I was writing this, word came that the Kentucky Conference voted “to encourage the bishop and Cabinet of the Kentucky Annual Conference to explore the Book of Discipline Paragraph 2549 as a potential means for facilitating a fair and just pathway for churches to exit The United Methodist Church.” One fears that many conferences will take the approach of the Northeastern College of Bishops in denying disaffiliation and holding on to churches for every last dime they can get. One wonders which approach might more closely reflect the spirit of Jesus and set a hospitable and positive tone for the new Methodism.

Thomas Lambrecht is a ​​​​​​​United Methodist clergyperson and vice president of Good News. The South Carolina Annual Conference is attempting to create a bridge for churches. Arthur Ravenel Jr. Bridge in South Carolina. Photo by David Martin Jr. (Pexels).