General Conference Delegates Cut

General Conference Delegates Cut

By Walter Fenton –

Fenton

Fenton

For the first time since the creation of the United Methodist Church the number of delegates slated to attend General Conference has been reduced. At its October 2013 meeting the Commission on the General Conference voted to reduce the number of delegates from approximately 1,000 to 850.

In November, the Rev. L. Fitzgerald Reist II, secretary of the General Conference, announced the precise apportionment of delegates to the various annual conferences in the United States and worldwide. Reist noted he is required to apportion delegates based on the figure supplied by the commission and a formula contained in the Book of Discipline. The application of the formula revealed that 864 delegates have been apportioned for General Conference 2016 to be held in Portland, Oregon, May 10-20.

Nearly every annual conference in the US will send a smaller delegation to General Conference 2016; several delegations will remain the same size they were in 2012.

However, the combination of the commission’s decision to reduce the number of delegates and the application of the Book of Discipline formula affects US annual conferences in dramatically different ways. For instance, the size of the California-Nevada and California-Pacific annual conferences’ delegations will remain the same as they were in 2012, six and eight delegates respectively. Conversely, both the North Georgia and Oklahoma delegations will each lose four delegates—a 15.4 percent reduction for the former and a 22.2 percent loss for the latter.

The impact on jurisdictions will vary widely as well. The Western Jurisdiction will lose two delegates for a 6.25 percent reduction, while the Southeastern Jurisdiction will lose 32 delegates for a 14.5 percent loss.

While the commission has been given authority to set the number of delegates to attend General Conference from anywhere between 600 to 1,000 delegates, it has no authority to change the formula for apportioning them. That authority resides with the General Conference.

Commission chairwoman Judi Kenaston and Reist stated that one of the main reasons the commission voted to reduce the number of delegates was the conviction that “a smaller General Conference [would] allow for a slightly better sense of community and a better chance to provide an environment for Christian Conferencing.” Commission members voted 14-2 in favor of the reduction. Kenaston and Reist noted that the two members opposed actually wanted a larger cut.

While the reduction in the number of delegates will reduce the costs of General Conference, Kenaston and Reist said financial considerations were not the driving factor in the reduction. “The commission’s intention,” they said, “is to make General Conference more effective.

Walter Fenton is the development director for Good News.