John Wesley and the early Methodists attracted many critics for their faithful ministry.

John Wesley and the early Methodists attracted many critics for their faithful ministry.

By Chris Ritter-

There is a new movement developing about which everyone in the church should be wary. While claiming to be faithful to the church, they are starting an organization that could potentially replace it. Like modern-day Pharisees, they promote a purification of our otherwise diverse and intentionally middle-of-the-road brand of Christianity. This organization is actually charging dues, which can do nothing but suck money from the coffers of our shared ministries. There are troubling associations between this group and those who have been destructively critical of the church in the past. They seem to downplay the resources of our official publishing houses in favor of their own. Those that don’t agree with the positions of their group are not even allowed in the door. This sort of thing is dangerous, potentially divisive, and can only lead the simple-minded astray. Faithful members of the church should remain very skeptical of this new movement if not oppose it outright.

Sound familiar? It should. These are the talking points of the critics of John Wesley and the early Methodists. The Eighteenth Century produced a plethora of anti-Methodist literature aimed at warning faithful Anglicans and people of reason against what they perceived as a fanatical and divisive movement that could only further harm a struggling church.

In his sermon “On the Ministerial Office,” Wesley styled the Methodist preachers “as extraordinary messengers, raised up to provoke the ordinary ones to jealousy.” And jealous they were. I suppose it is human nature to throw rocks at something we fear, or don’t completely understand. As he built an organization that transformed nations, Wesley spent a great deal of his time answering both official statements of concern by church leadership as well as swatting away a continuous volley of heckles from the cheap seats. (The blogosphere of his day came in the form of hastily printed pamphlets.)

You may also recognize the talking points of the Anti-Methodists in posts preemptively critical of the Wesleyan Covenant Association. These authors seem to completely miss the historic irony of Methodists discounting the potential value of a renewal organization rising up to stand next to an established ecclesial body. Methodism itself was founded as exactly this sort of parallel organization. The United Societies sprung from the Evangelical Revival in England as a movement promoting vibrant Christian ministry, faithful to scripture and deeply committed to both social and personal holiness.

There are those who build and those who critique. Both have their roles. (Constructive critique is actually quite valuable and welcome.) Made to choose, I would rather be among the Builders. That is how Wesley expended his enormous efforts. He was willing to take the arrows that are invariably aimed at leaders. As one voice committed to both the UM Church and WCA, I choose to believe that the best days of the Wesleyan Movement still lie ahead. I am eager to partner with like-minded folks who want to discover that future together – even as our denomination chooses its course.

So let the new anti-Methodists fire away. Those preparing for future electronic pamphleteering may consider these additional proven Eighteenth Century themes:

• “The Conveners of the Movement: Suspicious Characters All”

• “The Sinister Hidden Meaning Behind The Movement’s Seemingly innocuous Public Statements”

• “How One Cherry-Picked Gospel Verse Indicates that Jesus Would Never Be Part of Something Like This”

• “One Person’s Brave Journey of Deciding Not to Join the Organization”

• “The Bad Behavior of Someone who was Seen at the Organization’s Meeting”

• “Behind Closed Doors the Organization is Secretly and Deservedly Falling Apart”

• “The Autocratic Dictatorship of __________ (insert name of whoever is elected to lead)”

• “How Most People are Leaving the Organization (Even though Numbers are Going Up)”

• And, of course:  “Who Do Those People Think They Are, Anyway?”

Chris Ritter is is directing pastor of a multi-site ministry in Illinois that includes Geneseo First United Methodist Church, Cambridge UM Church, and Roots QC (a new church start in Rock Island). He represented the Illinois Great Rivers Annual Conference at the 2016 General Conference and is the author of Seven Things John Wesley Expected Us to Do for Kids (Abingdon). Reprinted by permission from Chris Ritter’s blog at


  1. I appreciate the historical parallel that you have drawn; however, I feel it is incomplete without an acknowledgement of the fact that Wesley never sought to separate from the Church of England and died an ordained Anglican priest. Are the theological differences in our denomination, which at the present time may seem irreconcilable, really greater than those between the founders of our denomination and the Church of England? I don’t disagree with your argument, but I hope that, in determining the path forward, those on all sides of the current debates are mindful of Wesley’s example of unity and the high value he placed upon it.

  2. Wesley separated from the Catholic Church because he realized their beliefs were contrary to the Bible. I be.ieve he would do the same todY.

  3. Most of us are waiting to see what our Bishops have to say, and what an inevitable (looks inevitable) called General Conference will say, but the new movement has already begun. It’s not a complete or “official” separation yet (“yet” being an operative word). Let’s not trivialize the reasons or throw mud at each other because this is about dearly held convictions, not “opinions,” no matter where we land on the issues at hand. There are lots of possibilities: We may stay united, we may divorce (I actually think it will be as messy as a divorce), and some may simply leave (some have already). We need to be realists here; this has been coming for a long time. Placing blame is only going to make things worse; there’s enough of it to go around anyway.

  4. did not recall that Wesley was a part of the Catholic Church. and while he found several things he did not agree with about the Catholic Church. He patterned his Doctrine of Sanctifying Grace after St. Thomas AQuenis. (misspelled) which is one of the cornerstone of Methodism.

  5. The time for a decision is upon us, even waiting 2 or 3 years will seem like forever. I have stopped going as often to my home church, choosing to attend a Lutheran church or a conservative Wesley focused UM church nearby. Considering I am in the New York Annual Conference, it is getting very difficult to find a Wesleyan church that follow the teachings of the Bible and Wesley. The majority of Annual Conference attendees are now voting Discipline breaking ultra liberal. I attended the WCA in Chicago last month and paid my dues. I am very glad there will be an option if the Bishops decision is too liberal. As for my home church our Pastor is Liberal, our Council Chair may leave the Methodist church altogether, depending on what the Bishops decide, and our Lay Leader is not renewing her Certified Lay Leadership. She is leaning towards the nearby (Missouri Synod) Lutheran Church whose Pastor preaches from the Bible. .I suggest praying until your knees are calloused.

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Mailing List!

Click here to sign up to our email lists:

•Perspective Newsletter (weekly)
• Transforming Congregations Newsletter (monthly)
• Renew Newsletter (monthly)

Make a Gift

Global Methodist Church

Is God Calling You For More?


Latest Articles: