FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 24, 2016
Washington, D.C. The United Methodist Council of Bishops has announced the membership of the Commission on a Way Forward.
“After three months of diligent and prayerful discernment, we have selected 8 bishops, 11 laity, 12 elders and 1 deacon to serve on the Commission,” said Bishop Bruce R. Ough, president of the Council of Bishops. “This group is representative of our theological diversity.”
Ough said the makeup of the 32-member commission is roughly comparable to U.S. and Central Conference membership.
All of the members of the Commission have already indicated their willingness and availability to serve. The team of moderators — Bishop Ken Carter, Bishop Sandra Steiner-Ball and Bishop David Yemba — will soon convene the Commission to begin to organize their work and finalize their meeting schedule.
The Commission’s mission is to “bring together persons deeply committed to the future(s) of The United Methodist Church, with an openness to developing new relationships with each other and exploring the potential future(s) of our denomination in light of General Conference and subsequent annual, jurisdictional and central conference actions.”
The 2016 General Conference gave a specific mandate to the Council of Bishops to lead The United Methodist Church in discerning and proposing a way forward through the present impasse related to human sexuality and the consequent questions about unity and covenant.
The Commission is a group appointed by the Council of Bishops to assist the Council in fulfilling this mandate. As such, the Council has appointed bishops from across the global connection to serve on the Commission alongside laity and clergy. While clergy and laity will vote at a General Conference on these matters, the bishops have the responsibility to lead the church. Thus, the Commission is designed to inform the Council’s leadership of the General Conference. After hearing concerns that the proposed composition did not include enough laity, three additional laypersons were added from the original pool of more than 300 nominees.
At their fall meeting (October 30 – November 2), the Council will make a decision about a called General Conference and will review a plan to conduct additional and complementary work in annual conferences designed to broaden the conversation with hundreds of lay and clergy members.
The members of the Commission are:
USA, Florida, elder, male
USA, California, elder, male
Jacques Umembudi Akasa
Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo, laity, male
USA, Virginia, elder, male
USA, Illinois, laity, male
Philippines, elder, female
Europe, Switzerland, laity, male
Philippines, bishop, male
USA, California, bishop, male
Aka Dago-Akribi Hortense
Africa, Côte d’Ivoire, laity, female
USA, New York, laity, male
USA, Kentucky, elder, female
USA, Texas, elder, male
Myungae Kim Lee
USA, New York, laity, female
Julie Hager Love
USA, Kentucky, deacon, female
Africa, Zimbabwe, laity, female
USA, Indiana, laity, female
Mande Guy Muyombo
Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo, elder, male
Africa, Zimbabwe, bishop, male
USA, Minnesota, laity, male
Casey Langley Orr
USA, Texas, elder, female
USA, Ohio, bishop, male
USA, Oregon, elder, female
USA, Pennsylvania, elder, male
USA, Texas, bishop, male
Jasmine Rose Smothers
USA, Georgia, elder, female
USA, Texas, laity, female
USA, Alabama, bishop, female
Europe, Germany, bishop, female
USA, Florida, laity, female
John Wesley Yohanna
Africa, Nigeria, bishop, male
Alfiado S. Zunguza
Africa, Mozambique, elder, male
Sandra Steiner Ball
USA, West Virginia, bishop, female
USA, Florida, bishop, male
Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo, bishop, male
Can you tell me if part of the money sent in from each church is still going to planned parenthood?
To the Commission,
I am aware that Bishop Ough, the President of the Council of Bishops has openly supported gays into positions of leadership in the United Methodist Church. Since he is the one who set up the commission, it is definitely suspect. No commission is needed. Unless Bishop Ough will resign his position, there is no hope of prosecution of those who have broken the laws of the United Methodist Church. Therefore, the only hope for preserving the United Methodist Church is a split, with those who wish to retain the language in the United Methodist Book of Discipline aligning with the Wesleyan Covenant Association, and the “progressive liberals” with Bishop Ough. Otherwise, there will be a mass of thousands of Methodists completely leaving the United Methodist Church. I believe the split in the UMC should be within 6 months, not 2 years, as has been stated in the letter to the Council of Bishops. One UMC already has a pending legal suit against the western jurisdiction whose members have broken the laws of the church.
It better not be.
Not a lawyer, but it looks as if the Judicial Council is affirming the Book of Discipline (below) as the law of the church and is directing Bishops to do their jobs and render rulings based on church law instead of trying to ignore it or find ways around it. Please correct me if I’m wrong here.
Do you know the name of the UM Church that has a pending law suit against the Western Jurisdiction. I am a member of a conservative UM church in Colorado Springs with a progressive senior pastor.