>Features
Portraying Jesus
Holly McClure talks with Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel about The Passion
The feminist strength of Passion
Kathryn Jean Lopez reveals how Mel Gibson's portrayal of women is sure to
open eyes
The faith that compels us
H.T. Maclin recollects the start of the Mission Society for United Methodists
Good News at General Conference
Scott N. Field explains how United Methodist leadership and mission can be strengthened in Pittsburgh
Comics look to Bible for exciting plots
Terry Mattingly remarks on the newest Christian trends in the influential world of graphic novels
How we open our hearts to God
Coretta Scott King remembers how the Civil Rights movement was sustained by prayer
The tale we've fallen into
Sarah Arthur muses on why we never outgrow The Lord of the Rings
>COLUMNS
> Editorial
Exactly what is a “conflicted” church?
Renew Women's Network
Who are we? The renewal groups are the best friends of United Methodism
The Next Generation
Our response to postmodernism: Po-mophobia or Po-mophilia?
The Great Commission
Fruit is about people, not tasks
From the Heart
If only for this life
DEPARTMENTS
Letters to the editor
News Analysis
Who profits from the Methodist Building?
News
Scholar calls creed “world's true story”
Good News prepares for Pittsburgh, celebrates Renew book,
honors the Snyders
Freud and C.S. Lewis to “debate” on PBS
Remembering Virginia Law Shell (1923-2004)
Mel Gibson might be my favorite feminist. As you probably suspect, I don’t have in mind the usual definition of “feminism.” I can guarantee you there’ll be no fawning Ms. magazine cover story on Gibson, but allow me to explain.
If you want to understand—and celebrate—women, you should see Gibson’s remarkable film, The Passion of the Christ. Consider, for example, a scene that has Mary standing on the sidelines after walking a little bit away from the place where her son is being brutally beaten. She’s getting beyond the point of being able to take the unbearable pain, but she is slowly gathering her strength, her faith—and is even able to comfort Mary Magdalene, a friend.
Lending a hand of friendship to Christ’s mother is a very unlikely sister: Claudia, the wife of Pontius Pilate. Claudia isn’t happy with her husband’s general situation, and she’s not keen on his putting Jesus of Nazareth to death. We know what Pilate chooses in the end, but Claudia does her darnedest to guide him. She is a decent character, who bears her own crosses and evinces nobility throughout. When Mary is at one of her hardest moments, it is Claudia who walks over and hands towels to her, which she soon uses to wipe up the precious blood of her son.
Mary feels pain acutely. Mother and son help one another. In another poignant scene, she is starting to lose it again, standing in an alleyway, not knowing if she can do anything for her son. At this point, there’s a beautiful flashback to Christ’s childhood, in which he falls down and his mother does what is only natural: She runs to him. The movie flashes forward again as Mary does likewise, running to her 33-year-old son. With the gentlest touch, Jesus gives his mother strength, even though he’s a bloody mess in indescribable pain—all of which he bears with the kind of grace only divinity can provide.
I don’t think many self-described feminists would agree, but there is something unique about women, and Gibson’s movie captures it perfectly in Mary, Mary Magdalene, Veronica (who voluntarily wipes Christ’s face along his arduous road to Calvary), and Claudia. He shows a real understanding of the depth of women’s feeling and the unique role that follows from it: that of giving support and guidance. This understanding of femininity cannot be missed—and should be noted and valued.
This understanding is nothing new to Christians. Christ suffered for the evil in the world so that our souls might be eternally saved. To do that, he needed to live as a man—and he needed a mother, not just as a means by which to be born, but also as a loving collaborator in mankind’s salvation.
Christian women know what pop culture thinks of their role: subservient; unworthy; barefoot and pregnant; seen but not heard. Consider, in contrast, the words of Pope John Paul II: “In transforming culture so that it supports life, women occupy a place, in thought and action, which is unique and decisive. It depends on them to promote a ‘new feminism’ that rejects the temptation of imitating models of ‘male domination,’ in order to acknowledge and affirm the true genius of women in every aspect of the life of society, and overcome all discrimination, violence and exploitation.” Mel Gibson gets that genius.
Archbishop Charles Chaput of the Catholic archdiocese of Denver gets it too. After watching The Passion, he said, “The reason the secular world hates films like The Passion of the Christ is because they persuade the heart with the logic of love. The reason the secular world seeks to reinvent or reinterpret Mary is because she’s dangerous. She’s the model of mature human character — a human being who co-creates a new world not through power, but through unselfish love, faith in God, and the rejection of power.” He continued, “The genius of every woman is to love; to protect and nourish the lives entrusted to her; and to support the full development of life in others. It’s the same whether you’re a mother, or a [nun], or a woman who lives the single vocation.” The Passion shows this genius in honesty, respect, and admiration.
There are more things going on in The Passion of the Christ than one can possibly grasp in one viewing—many with the potential for changing one’s image of the gospel, at minimum. It is the sheer un-P.C., frank retelling of a story central to the existence of a majority of the planet—one in which divinely designed women play no small role. No wonder folks have resorted to convenient distractions instead of talking about the actual, multifaceted, countercultural aspects of the movie.
In a day when “Take Your Rosaries Off My Ovaries” is an often-heard chorus in mainstream abortion debates, Mel Gibson’s understanding of women and his articulation of their unique mission could have remarkable repercussions. This new—or old, inasmuch as it is natural and commonsensical—kind of feminism, a focus on the different contributions of men and women and the different ways they live their missions, should make us all rethink how we live and love.
Kathryn Jean Lopez is the editor of National Review Online (www.nationalreview.com) and associate editor at National Review. Additionally, her work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, The Women’s Quarterly, The National Catholic Register, among other publications. Reprinted by permission.
Click here to send your response plus the title of this article to us at Good News.